Krugman and every other economist/analyst I’ve heard over the last few days come to the same conclusion when talking about McCain and Clinton’s proposed gas tax holiday.
Pointless and borderline pandering for votes.
Why doesn’t cutting the gas tax this summer make sense? It’s Econ 101 tax incidence theory: if the supply of a good is more or less unresponsive to the price, the price to consumers will always rise until the quantity demanded falls to match the quantity supplied. Cut taxes, and all that happens is that the pretax price rises by the same amount. The McCain gas tax plan is a giveaway to oil companies, disguised as a gift to consumers.
And on Clinton’s plan, specifically:
The Clinton twist is that she proposes paying for the revenue loss with an excess profits tax on oil companies. In one pocket, out the other. So it’s pointless, not evil. But it is pointless, and disappointing.
And who’s the only canidate with the guts to stand up against this useless plan (even when it sounds so good at first listen)? That’s right, Obama.
Related posts:
- Krugman Catches McCain's Exaggerations
- More McCain Campaign Distortions
- Sprint redux
- Will McCain punk out?
- Sprint is a hot mess over the Pre
Tags: clinton, economics, election, gas tax holiday, krugman, mcbush, mccain, obama, primary
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, April 30th, 2008 at 12:29 pm and is filed under Politics.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.