<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Questions!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasondettbarn.com/blog/2008/09/05/no-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasondettbarn.com/blog/2008/09/05/no-questions/</link>
	<description>Husband, Father of 3 Girls, Tech Geek, Lover of the Interwebs. New site coming soon.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 01:32:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: endonend</title>
		<link>http://www.jasondettbarn.com/blog/2008/09/05/no-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>endonend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.end-on-end.com/2008/09/05/no-questions/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Sour grapes, you&#039;re right... but it&#039;s the McSame campaign saying &quot;I&#039;m taking my ball and going home,&quot; because they don&#039;t like their VP being vetted in public.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Saw a recent poll -- over 65% of Americans have no clue about Palin&#039;s past performance, her credentials as a &#039;reformer&#039;, or the scandals she is involved in... but almost 70% know about her daughter&#039;s pregnancy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Are those the kind of priorities Repubs value? The tabloid, half truth, spin-it-to-death stories? It sure seems like those are the ones they are pushing, because they have no where to stand on the real issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I mean, what excites you about McCain? If you make under $250k per year, you&#039;ll get a better tax break; some kind of universal health care; more focus on the environment and alternative, renewable energies; focus on actually improving education (rather than a policy with a snappy name that doesn&#039;t do anything, like Bush); someone who actually understands the constitution and defends it; and someone who acknowledges that the economy is actually doing pretty poorly for a vast majority of Americans -- with Obama.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Palin and McCain don&#039;t talk about those issues very much, because they can&#039;t compete. Their campaign manager even says so... it tells you a lot about the campaign, when both acceptance speeches didn&#039;t touch on very many key issues (McCain&#039;s) or none at all (Palin).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sour grapes, you&#39;re right&#8230; but it&#39;s the McSame campaign saying &#8220;I&#39;m taking my ball and going home,&#8221; because they don&#39;t like their VP being vetted in public.</p>
<p>Saw a recent poll &#8212; over 65% of Americans have no clue about Palin&#39;s past performance, her credentials as a &#39;reformer&#39;, or the scandals she is involved in&#8230; but almost 70% know about her daughter&#39;s pregnancy. </p>
<p>Are those the kind of priorities Repubs value? The tabloid, half truth, spin-it-to-death stories? It sure seems like those are the ones they are pushing, because they have no where to stand on the real issues.</p>
<p>I mean, what excites you about McCain? If you make under $250k per year, you&#39;ll get a better tax break; some kind of universal health care; more focus on the environment and alternative, renewable energies; focus on actually improving education (rather than a policy with a snappy name that doesn&#39;t do anything, like Bush); someone who actually understands the constitution and defends it; and someone who acknowledges that the economy is actually doing pretty poorly for a vast majority of Americans &#8212; with Obama.</p>
<p>Palin and McCain don&#39;t talk about those issues very much, because they can&#39;t compete. Their campaign manager even says so&#8230; it tells you a lot about the campaign, when both acceptance speeches didn&#39;t touch on very many key issues (McCain&#39;s) or none at all (Palin).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: endonend</title>
		<link>http://www.jasondettbarn.com/blog/2008/09/05/no-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>endonend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.end-on-end.com/2008/09/05/no-questions/#comment-261</guid>
		<description>Sour grapes, you&#039;re right... but it&#039;s the McSame campaign saying &quot;I&#039;m taking my ball and going home,&quot; because they don&#039;t like their VP being vetted in public.Saw a recent poll -- over 65% of Americans have no clue about Palin&#039;s past performance, her credentials as a &#039;reformer&#039;, or the scandals she is involved in... but almost 70% know about her daughter&#039;s pregnancy. Are those the kind of priorities Repubs value? The tabloid, half truth, spin-it-to-death stories? It sure seems like those are the ones they are pushing, because they have no where to stand on the real issues.I mean, what excites you about McCain? If you make under $250k per year, you&#039;ll get a better tax break; some kind of universal health care; more focus on the environment and alternative, renewable energies; focus on actually improving education (rather than a policy with a snappy name that doesn&#039;t do anything, like Bush); someone who actually understands the constitution and defends it; and someone who acknowledges that the economy is actually doing pretty poorly for a vast majority of Americans -- with Obama.Palin and McCain don&#039;t talk about those issues very much, because they can&#039;t compete. Their campaign manager even says so... it tells you a lot about the campaign, when both acceptance speeches didn&#039;t touch on very many key issues (McCain&#039;s) or none at all (Palin).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sour grapes, you&#039;re right&#8230; but it&#039;s the McSame campaign saying &#8220;I&#039;m taking my ball and going home,&#8221; because they don&#039;t like their VP being vetted in public.Saw a recent poll &#8212; over 65% of Americans have no clue about Palin&#039;s past performance, her credentials as a &#039;reformer&#039;, or the scandals she is involved in&#8230; but almost 70% know about her daughter&#039;s pregnancy. Are those the kind of priorities Repubs value? The tabloid, half truth, spin-it-to-death stories? It sure seems like those are the ones they are pushing, because they have no where to stand on the real issues.I mean, what excites you about McCain? If you make under $250k per year, you&#039;ll get a better tax break; some kind of universal health care; more focus on the environment and alternative, renewable energies; focus on actually improving education (rather than a policy with a snappy name that doesn&#039;t do anything, like Bush); someone who actually understands the constitution and defends it; and someone who acknowledges that the economy is actually doing pretty poorly for a vast majority of Americans &#8212; with Obama.Palin and McCain don&#039;t talk about those issues very much, because they can&#039;t compete. Their campaign manager even says so&#8230; it tells you a lot about the campaign, when both acceptance speeches didn&#039;t touch on very many key issues (McCain&#039;s) or none at all (Palin).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Eidens</title>
		<link>http://www.jasondettbarn.com/blog/2008/09/05/no-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>J Eidens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 04:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.end-on-end.com/2008/09/05/no-questions/#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Bada-bing!!!!  Sour grapes.  Face it, the dems were out manuvered.  I suppose the lady will at least be diplomatic and not refer to a Russian Head of State as  a &quot;commie pig&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bada-bing!!!!  Sour grapes.  Face it, the dems were out manuvered.  I suppose the lady will at least be diplomatic and not refer to a Russian Head of State as  a &#8220;commie pig&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Eidens</title>
		<link>http://www.jasondettbarn.com/blog/2008/09/05/no-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>J Eidens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 04:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.end-on-end.com/2008/09/05/no-questions/#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Bada-bing!!!!  Sour grapes.  Face it, the dems were out manuvered.  I suppose the lady will at least be diplomatic and not refer to a Russian Head of State as  a &quot;commie pig&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bada-bing!!!!  Sour grapes.  Face it, the dems were out manuvered.  I suppose the lady will at least be diplomatic and not refer to a Russian Head of State as  a &#8220;commie pig&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

