Notes Tagged ‘bush’

Bush's Damage

December 15th, 2008
482. 

Reading stuff like this makes me happy the Bush administration’s bungling days are almost over:

The result of deficit spending is debt.  When President Bush took office, the national debt was $5.7 trillion.  Now it is $10.6 trillion — and Congress voted in October to raise the debt ceiling to $11.3 trillion, the seventh such hike since President Bush to office and the second since last July.  If, as is quite likely, we reach the new ceiling by January 20, the outgoing President will have managed to amass more debt than all of his predecessors combined.

Emphasis mine.

This comes from an article in January’s edition of Harper’s Magazine, where Linda Bilmes, public finance lecturer at Harvard, and Joseph Stiglitz, 2001 winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics and University Professor of Economics at Columbia, describe the cost of the Bush Presidency in an article titled “The $10 Trillion dollar hangover: Paying the Price for the Bush years.” (The $10 trillion comes from money already spent and future obligations from Bush policy.)

More details can be read in the Daily Kos post I linked above…

Obama is going to have a tough road ahead of him.

Tags: ,
Noted in Politics    |    Permanent link

Will it really end?

October 9th, 2008
392. 

Over on AlterNet, Naomi Wolf posted an article that basically leads to a very scary thought. What if Bush doesn’t leave office come next year? What if there’s a coup? Crazy? Maybe not so much, according to Wolf.

In her article, Thousands of Troops Are Deployed on U.S. Streets Ready to Carry Out “Crowd Control”, she points to the following events:

  • The First Brigade of the Third Infantry Division has been deployed to the United Stats as of October 1st, with the “tated mission is the form of crowd control they practiced in Iraq, subduing “unruly individuals,” and the management of a national emergency.”
  • George Bush struck down Posse Comitatus, thus making it legal for military to patrol the U.S. He has also legally established that in the “War on Terror,” the U.S. is at war around the globe and thus the whole world is a battlefield. Thus the U.S. is also a battlefield.
  • Bush also led change to the 1807 Insurrection Act to give him far broader powers in the event of a loosely defined “insurrection” or many other “conditions” he has the power to identify. The Constitution allows the suspension of habeas corpus — habeas corpus prevents us from being seized by the state and held without trial — in the event of an “insurrection.” With his own army force now, his power to call a group of protesters or angry voters “insurgents” staging an “insurrection” is strengthened.
  • U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman of California said to Congress, captured on C-Span and viewable on YouTube, that individual members of the House were threatened with martial law within a week if they did not pass the bailout bill.
  • She also interviewed a retired U.S. Air Force Colonel and asked the types of questions you need to read the answers to believe. (Definitely worth clicking through just to read those.)

Anyway…  Pretty compelling? Absolutely. Likely? Hopefully not. Scary? Yes.

Let’s look at Posse Comitatus and the Insurrection Act, since I wasn’t familiar with either.

According to Wikipedia, Poss Comitatus “generally prohibits federal military personnel and units of the United States National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress.”

Also, (from the same page) recent legislative activity:

  • HR5122 also known as the John Warner Defense Authorization Act (2006) gave the President the power to employ the armed forces to restore public order in any state of the United States the president determines hinders the execution of laws or the Constitution.
  • HR4986 also known as the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 included languague that repealed those changes, but Bush (while signing the bill) included a signing statement that basically says I signed this bill but the changes to Posse Comitatus hinder my ability to protect national security and execute my responsibilities as Commander in Chief, so I’m going to do what’s necessary to execute my consitutional responsibilities.

So, it seems as that part checks out. In the ‘War on Terror’, Posse doesn’t exist according to the Bush Administration.

And now the Insurrection Act. According to Wikipedia: “The Insurrection Act of 1807 is the set of laws that govern the President of the United States of America’s ability to deploy troops within the United States to put down lawlessness, insurrection and rebellion.”

Recent legislative activity (same page):

  • The 2007 Defense Authorization Bill (September 2006), “widens the President’s ability to deploy troops within the United States to enforce the laws. Under this act, the President may also deploy troops as a police force during a natural disaster, epidemic, serious public health emergency, terrorist attack, or other condition, when the President determines that the authorities of the state are incapable of maintaining public order. The bill also modified Sec. 334 of the Insurrection Act, giving the President authority to order the dispersal of either insurgents or “those obstructing the enforcement of the laws.” The new law changed the name of the chapter from “Insurrection” to “Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order.”
  • The 2008 Defense Authorization Bill (HR1585), repeals the changes made in the 2007 bill, but was pocket vetoed by Bush.
  • HR4986 (mentioned above), has been passed which also repeals the changes made in the 2007 bill. And you read about the Bush signing statement.

So that one pretty much checks out too, with the same outcome as Posse.. The Act was changed in 2006, repealed by Congress in 2008, but signing statements and vetoes still give Bush the powers he received in the original changes. Or at least that is how the Bush Administration views the law. (See my previous post on signing statements. Since I published that in 2006, I’m not even sure how far Bush has gone since then!)

Anyway, something to think about as we get closer to the end of the Bush administration. This makes it even more crucial that McBush doesn’t get elected and we get someone like Obama (calm, measured, thoughtful responses to issues; a respect for the Constitution; and a respect for social justice) in the White House.

Tags: , , , ,
Noted in Politics    |    Permanent link

The Bush Economy

July 7th, 2008
210. 

Today’s Krugman goodness… Op-Ed Column and Blog.

From the blog, a graph comparing the ‘expansion’ during Bush to other post-WWII expansions. The only winner? You guessed it… corporate profits.

Tags: , , , ,
Noted in Politics    |    Permanent link

Wow, this guy has balls.

January 20th, 2008
174. 

I am really glad there is only one year left of this douche bag of a “Commander in Chief”.

Tags: , ,
Noted in Politics, Videos    |    Permanent link

More on Iran; 2008 election tidbits

December 5th, 2007
159. 

Lots of news lately, so here’s a round up of the most interesting stories:

* One year ago (“wow!”:http://www.end-on-end.com/txp/2007/12/03/hmm-why-is-bush-so-hot-and-bothered-over-iran), Seymour Hersh wrote in the New Yorker that the Bush Administration was holding up the “release of a National Intelligence Estimate on Iran that had failed to find any evidence of an ongoing nuclear weapons program. “:http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/11/27/061127fa_fact

* Surprise of the day! “Joe Scarborough and Pat Buchanan want hearings over the Iran NIE.”:http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/12/05/morning-joe-scarborough-and-buchanan-want-hearings-over-nie/ Bush is either “lying” or “stupid”? Wow. Bush can even alienate his closest allies!

* Rising Republican presidential hopeful Mike Huckabee “had a role in releasing a serial rapist who went on to rape and murder at least one other woman”:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/04/documents-expose-huckabee_n_75362.html

* Not to mention Huckabee doesn’t seem to be up on current events. He recently claimed he “didn’t know about the Iran NIE or what it said.”:http://thinkprogress.org/2007/12/04/huckabee-clueless-on-iran-nie/
And this guy wants to be president? “I agree with Krugman.”:http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/26/why-hate-huckabee/

* And “Barack finally has a small lead in Iowa!”:http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22863769-2703,00.html Yes.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Noted in Politics    |    Permanent link

Hmm. Why is Bush so hot and bothered over Iran?

December 3rd, 2007
158. 

Seems they ended their nuclear arms program in 2003 — over four years ago. ["NY Times":http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/03/world/middleeast/03cnd-iran.html?ex=1354424400&en=db7cde09fe490f20&ei=5124&partner=digg&exprod=digg]

So why are the Bushies so gung-ho on starting another war? Don’t they have two others they need to finish first? I mean, last I checked, Iraq and Afghanistan weren’t going all that well.

Not to mention that Iran already holds the foundation of democracy – a large youth population that likes Western culture. So, we bomb their country and piss these young people off? Sounds like an ingenious plan! Well, ingenious if you want to insure the “war on terror” never ends.

Seriously, when is this administration going to be impeached?

Tags: , ,
Noted in Politics    |    Permanent link