Notes Tagged ‘mcbush’

F.U.D. vs Hope

October 30th, 2008
416. 

The election has boiled down to this, in my opinion: Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt (F.U.D.) versus Hope.

The McCain/Palin campaign and right wingers sling the F.U.D. better than anyone. Remember, when you go to the polls next Tuesday that Barack is: black, an Arab, a Muslim, a terrorist, a friend of terrorists, a communist, a socialist, not born in the U.S., a man of the streets, a druggy, a womanizer, Osama, a thug, naive, anti-Israel, the anti-christ, satan, foreign, an unknown, a racist, uppity, an elitist, not patriotic, anti-American, and a liberal. (I’ll spare the racist slurs.) And don’t forget, he’s going to re-write the Constitution, raise your taxes and redistribute wealth.

Contrast that with this:

Now I agree Obama is not perfect and he will be hard pressed to make most of his plans happen, but what does McCain offer that gives you hope for the future? Not much that I’ve seen. It’s almost entirely status quo – from economic policies to Iraq. I constantly ask McCain supporters (the few I do know) what does he offer you?, what excites you about him? I never really get any solid answers to those questions.

When it comes down to it, it’s the same as we’ve seen for the last 8 years (and all the Republican years of my life time.) Pro-corporate, pro-rich, pro-profits, trickle down, pro-war, faux compassionate, faux small government, fear mongering, divisive, vote supressing, huge deficit running, national debt growing B.S that is the Republican brand. And it has to end. It has destroyed the middle class, caused the current financial crisis, ruined our standing in the world, and it had it’s chance… and it doesn’t work. Time to move on to something progressive.

Country First, McCain? Please. More like Wealthy First, Evangelicals First, Identity Politics First, F.U.D. First. You were an honorable man, but the campaign you’ve run is shameful and goes against everything you used to stand for… remember what Bush did to you in 2000? Fast forward 8 years and you are Bush – in more ways than one, Mr. 90%.

I’m just glad Obama has stayed above the mud slinging. That alone shows the character I want in my President.

Vote Obama. But more importantly, vote!

Update: And consider this, from Talking Points Memo:

Obama can go on TV for 30 minutes and not mention John McCain even once.

No way would the reverse be true.

Update 2: And add this one: Barack is the son of Malcolm X. Seriously.

Tags: , , , , , ,
Noted in Politics, Videos    |    Permanent link

Joe the (unlicensed) Plumber?

October 16th, 2008
410. 

It seems the McCain camp is really having problems vetting folks these days (especially someone you are going to mention almost two dozen times at the final debate)… the AP is reportng that Joe the Plumber is not a licensed plumber AND he owes $1200 in back taxes.

The head of the local plumbers’ union says added:

“He has no license whatsoever with the city of Toledo,” said Tom Joseph, the business manager for Local Union 50 of the Plumbers, Steamfitters and Service Mechanics, which has endorsed Obama. “He has no license in the state of Ohio. He has no contractor’s license in the state of Ohio. He is not a plumber. He works for a plumber.”

And how much is the business Joe works for worth?

According to Joseph, Newell Plumbing & Heating is far from a $250K-a-year operation. Newell is running “a two-man shop,” he said. “This is not a thriving business.”

Isn’t there a chance it could be worth $250K? “Oh, God no,” Joseph said. “Maybe if he sells him the house, the garage.” He explained that the address for the business “is where the man lives at.”

Maybe Joe slept at a Holiday Inn Express the night before he got his 15 minutes of fame.

Tags: , , , , , ,
Noted in Politics    |    Permanent link

Women's Health, Extreme?

October 16th, 2008
408. 

John McCain at last night’s debate:

“Just again, the example of the eloquence of Sen. Obama. He’s health for the mother. You know, that’s been stretched by the pro-abortion movement in America to mean almost anything. That’s the extreme pro-abortion position, quote, ‘health.’”

So, women’s health is extreme? Just goes to show you – if you are female you shouldn’t vote for John McCain. You’ve been warned. (See the Women’s Issues section at the top of this page. Yeah I know I haven’t updated it in a while… McCain was doing a better job than I was anyway.)

Not to mention pro-abortion? No one is pro-abortion, John. That’s one fact that the right can’t seem to get through their heads. Just because you are pro-choice doesn’t mean you’ll choose abortion. It just means you don’t want white males in power making the decision for you. Simple, huh?

Tags: , , , , , ,
Noted in Politics    |    Permanent link

Joe Six Pack

October 9th, 2008
394. 

This one is a little shorter than my previous post!

Just wanted to point out that I am glad someone in the media finally called Joe Six Pack what it really is…

George Packer in the New Yorker:

No one with a sharp, clear image in her head of a hard-pressed American would use a term like “Joe Six Pack,” an insulting cliché on the order of “the little people.”

Couldn’t agree more. Every time I hear Joe Six Pack, I wince. It’s sad that Palin actually thinks it is in the same ballpark as Hockey or Soccer Mom. Sorry, but insinuating that all average folks have to live for is a six pack is derogatory and ignorant. But it seems as if the whole Republican ticket is out of touch with the middle class. Not only does McCain not mention the term ‘middle class’, but he’s said a good definition of rich is $5 million and that Americans wouldn’t pick lettuce for $50 an hour.

Update: And that isn’t even mentioning that Palin is no where near an ‘average joe”.  The Palin household is worth at least $1.2 million dollars and they routinely pulled down six figure incomes, even before she was governor. And remember, this is ALASKA. She’s well off, face it.

The estimate includes 5 properties, a few planes, some boats, and don’t forget, the very non-elitist gubernatorial salary of $125K/year, but it doesn’t include the $11K the family receives every year in state oil dividends that help enable Alaskans to be so anti-tax.

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Noted in Politics    |    Permanent link

Will it really end?

October 9th, 2008
392. 

Over on AlterNet, Naomi Wolf posted an article that basically leads to a very scary thought. What if Bush doesn’t leave office come next year? What if there’s a coup? Crazy? Maybe not so much, according to Wolf.

In her article, Thousands of Troops Are Deployed on U.S. Streets Ready to Carry Out “Crowd Control”, she points to the following events:

  • The First Brigade of the Third Infantry Division has been deployed to the United Stats as of October 1st, with the “tated mission is the form of crowd control they practiced in Iraq, subduing “unruly individuals,” and the management of a national emergency.”
  • George Bush struck down Posse Comitatus, thus making it legal for military to patrol the U.S. He has also legally established that in the “War on Terror,” the U.S. is at war around the globe and thus the whole world is a battlefield. Thus the U.S. is also a battlefield.
  • Bush also led change to the 1807 Insurrection Act to give him far broader powers in the event of a loosely defined “insurrection” or many other “conditions” he has the power to identify. The Constitution allows the suspension of habeas corpus — habeas corpus prevents us from being seized by the state and held without trial — in the event of an “insurrection.” With his own army force now, his power to call a group of protesters or angry voters “insurgents” staging an “insurrection” is strengthened.
  • U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman of California said to Congress, captured on C-Span and viewable on YouTube, that individual members of the House were threatened with martial law within a week if they did not pass the bailout bill.
  • She also interviewed a retired U.S. Air Force Colonel and asked the types of questions you need to read the answers to believe. (Definitely worth clicking through just to read those.)

Anyway…  Pretty compelling? Absolutely. Likely? Hopefully not. Scary? Yes.

Let’s look at Posse Comitatus and the Insurrection Act, since I wasn’t familiar with either.

According to Wikipedia, Poss Comitatus “generally prohibits federal military personnel and units of the United States National Guard under federal authority from acting in a law enforcement capacity within the United States, except where expressly authorized by the Constitution or Congress.”

Also, (from the same page) recent legislative activity:

  • HR5122 also known as the John Warner Defense Authorization Act (2006) gave the President the power to employ the armed forces to restore public order in any state of the United States the president determines hinders the execution of laws or the Constitution.
  • HR4986 also known as the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 included languague that repealed those changes, but Bush (while signing the bill) included a signing statement that basically says I signed this bill but the changes to Posse Comitatus hinder my ability to protect national security and execute my responsibilities as Commander in Chief, so I’m going to do what’s necessary to execute my consitutional responsibilities.

So, it seems as that part checks out. In the ‘War on Terror’, Posse doesn’t exist according to the Bush Administration.

And now the Insurrection Act. According to Wikipedia: “The Insurrection Act of 1807 is the set of laws that govern the President of the United States of America’s ability to deploy troops within the United States to put down lawlessness, insurrection and rebellion.”

Recent legislative activity (same page):

  • The 2007 Defense Authorization Bill (September 2006), “widens the President’s ability to deploy troops within the United States to enforce the laws. Under this act, the President may also deploy troops as a police force during a natural disaster, epidemic, serious public health emergency, terrorist attack, or other condition, when the President determines that the authorities of the state are incapable of maintaining public order. The bill also modified Sec. 334 of the Insurrection Act, giving the President authority to order the dispersal of either insurgents or “those obstructing the enforcement of the laws.” The new law changed the name of the chapter from “Insurrection” to “Enforcement of the Laws to Restore Public Order.”
  • The 2008 Defense Authorization Bill (HR1585), repeals the changes made in the 2007 bill, but was pocket vetoed by Bush.
  • HR4986 (mentioned above), has been passed which also repeals the changes made in the 2007 bill. And you read about the Bush signing statement.

So that one pretty much checks out too, with the same outcome as Posse.. The Act was changed in 2006, repealed by Congress in 2008, but signing statements and vetoes still give Bush the powers he received in the original changes. Or at least that is how the Bush Administration views the law. (See my previous post on signing statements. Since I published that in 2006, I’m not even sure how far Bush has gone since then!)

Anyway, something to think about as we get closer to the end of the Bush administration. This makes it even more crucial that McBush doesn’t get elected and we get someone like Obama (calm, measured, thoughtful responses to issues; a respect for the Constitution; and a respect for social justice) in the White House.

Tags: , , , ,
Noted in Politics    |    Permanent link

More McCain Campaign Distortions

June 10th, 2008
208. 

Two in the same day?! McCain is seriously disappointing and a vast departure from his “independent” days. He’s become a 100% Conservative Republican Shill. He’ll do virtually anything to win over the Republican base. Sad.

ThinkProgress.org noted today that McCain’s top economic advisor, Carly Fiorina, claimed on Fox News that Obama hasn’t proposed one single tax cut, despite details to the contrary on his campaign website.

The best part, was this quote:

FIORINA: So I think what you have here is Barack Obama, without a great deal of understanding in the economy, going back to the same old tax- and-spend philosophies of the liberal Democratic past. He reminds me a bit of Jimmy Carter — or Herbert Hoover, even worse.

So this coming from the McCain campaign, the same John McCain who has repeatedly said he doesn’t really understand economics? The same John McSame who is basically running on the Bush economic policy – the one, you know, that is spend and cut taxes, leading us to massive deficits and a deepening recession? Yeah, that’s him.

And as ThinkProgress noted, the same John McCain that has been less than forthcoming about his own economic plan:

In the same segment, Fiorina claimed that her boss, John McCain, “has been very explicit about the taxes he will cut.” But she neglected to mention that McCain is far from explicit in explaining how he’ll pay for massive deficits created by his tax proposals. In fact, he refuses to name a single program he’ll cut.

So, when do the gloves come off, MSM? You are the ones that said as soon as there were two running for President, McCain would get the same scrutiny, weren’t you?

Tags: , , , , ,
Noted in Politics    |    Permanent link

Why I am voting Republican this Fall

June 10th, 2008
207. 

Tags: , , , , ,
Noted in Politics, Videos    |    Permanent link

Krugman Catches McCain's Exaggerations

June 10th, 2008
206. 

John McCain speech at the National Small Business Summit today attempted to talk about the negatives of a Barack Obama economic plan, however there was a small problem. He exaggerated a number Obama’s positions. Luckily, Paul Krugman at the NY Times pointed this out in a today’s blog post.

McCain raised Obama’s Estate Tax rate by a whopping 10 percentage points (claiming 55%, while Obama’s plan is 45% with a $3.5 million exemption.) He also tried to convince the small business owners that Obama’s tax plan would raise taxes for 21.6 million sole proprietorships, however Krugman’s research lowered that number to 479,000 – or 2% of the total McCain claims.

How long until the media starts pounding McCain for these inaccuracies, exaggerations, and his multitude of flip flops on so many issues? I seem to remember they had fun with Kerry and Gore on these issues the last two Presidential cycles…

Tags: , , , ,
Noted in Politics    |    Permanent link

Krugman on the proposed gas tax holiday

April 30th, 2008
198. 

Krugman and every other economist/analyst I’ve heard over the last few days come to the same conclusion when talking about McCain and Clinton’s proposed gas tax holiday.

Pointless and borderline pandering for votes.

Here’s Krugman’s take:

Why doesn’t cutting the gas tax this summer make sense? It’s Econ 101 tax incidence theory: if the supply of a good is more or less unresponsive to the price, the price to consumers will always rise until the quantity demanded falls to match the quantity supplied. Cut taxes, and all that happens is that the pretax price rises by the same amount. The McCain gas tax plan is a giveaway to oil companies, disguised as a gift to consumers.

And on Clinton’s plan, specifically:

The Clinton twist is that she proposes paying for the revenue loss with an excess profits tax on oil companies. In one pocket, out the other. So it’s pointless, not evil. But it is pointless, and disappointing.

And who’s the only canidate with the guts to stand up against this useless plan (even when it sounds so good at first listen)? That’s right, Obama.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Noted in Politics    |    Permanent link

Sweet Talk Express

April 26th, 2008
193. 

Tags: , , ,
Noted in Politics, Videos    |    Permanent link